PR. VI. BADAULI PS 112
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP266 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 266 | 52.05% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 158 | 30.92% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 71 | 13.89% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 5 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 511 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 266 | 51.65% | 1 | 100 | Strong |
| BSP | 158 | 30.68% | 2 | 68 | Average |
| BJP | 71 | 13.79% | 3 | 330 | Weak |
| INC | 5 | 0.97% | 4 | 163 | Poor |
| RVP | 4 | 0.78% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.39% | 7 | 78 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 251 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 190 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 237 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 370 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 328 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.