U. PR. VI. MAJHIWA (1-8 COMPOSITE) ROOM N0 1 PS 109
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP291 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 291 | 42.48% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 260 | 37.96% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 100 | 14.60% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 7 | 1.02% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 6 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.73% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 685 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 291 | 41.69% | 1 | 59 | Strong |
| SP | 260 | 37.25% | 2 | 107 | Average |
| BSP | 100 | 14.33% | 3 | 161 | Weak |
| JAP | 7 | 1.00% | 4 | 126 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.86% | 5 | 125 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.72% | 6 | 107 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.57% | 8 | 45 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.57% | 7 | 149 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.43% | 9 | 72 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.29% | 10 | 77 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.29% | 11 | 139 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 188 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.