PR. VI. PATWAN ROOM N0 3 PS 106
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP273 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 273 | 68.94% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 54 | 13.64% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 47 | 11.87% | |
| 4 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 8 | 2.02% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 4 | 1.01% | |
| 6 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 396 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 273 | 67.57% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| BJP | 54 | 13.37% | 2 | 346 | Weak |
| SP | 47 | 11.63% | 3 | 373 | Weak |
| RVP | 8 | 1.98% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.99% | 5 | 39 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.50% | 9 | 281 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 148 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.50% | 6 | 89 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.50% | 8 | 275 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.25% | 11 | 176 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 311 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 361 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.