PR. VI. PATWAN ROOM N0 2 PS 105
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP224 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 224 | 39.79% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 210 | 37.30% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 101 | 17.94% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 10 | 1.78% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 563 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 224 | 38.89% | 1 | 121 | Average |
| SP | 210 | 36.46% | 2 | 167 | Average |
| BSP | 101 | 17.53% | 3 | 159 | Weak |
| JAP | 10 | 1.74% | 4 | 88 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.22% | 5 | 97 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.52% | 6 | 205 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 136 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.35% | 9 | 75 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 88 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 310 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 211 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.