PR. VI. PATWAN ROOM N0 1 PS 104
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP436 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 436 | 70.66% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 141 | 22.85% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 13 | 2.11% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 10 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 617 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 436 | 69.87% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| BJP | 141 | 22.60% | 2 | 255 | Weak |
| BSP | 13 | 2.08% | 3 | 353 | Poor |
| AK | 10 | 1.60% | 4 | 35 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 38 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.64% | 6 | 184 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.48% | 7 | 246 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 138 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.32% | 8 | 147 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 185 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 323 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 297 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.