PR. VI. BHADWARI PS 103
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP279 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 279 | 45.51% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 208 | 33.93% | |
| 3 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 69 | 11.26% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 29 | 4.73% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 10 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 10 | 1.63% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 613 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 279 | 45.15% | 1 | 89 | Strong |
| BJP | 208 | 33.66% | 2 | 149 | Average |
| JAP | 69 | 11.17% | 3 | 12 | Weak |
| BSP | 29 | 4.69% | 4 | 317 | Poor |
| AK | 10 | 1.62% | 5 | 34 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.62% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.65% | 7 | 151 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 221 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 175 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 184 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 210 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 335 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.