POORV. MA. VI. JALALPUR PS 1
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP391 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 391 | 59.33% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 125 | 18.97% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 77 | 11.68% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 34 | 5.16% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 13 | 1.97% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 659 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 391 | 57.75% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| BSP | 125 | 18.46% | 2 | 115 | Weak |
| SP | 77 | 11.37% | 3 | 342 | Weak |
| AK | 34 | 5.02% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 1.92% | 5 | 19 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 96 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.59% | 7 | 34 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 68 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.44% | 9 | 210 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.30% | 11 | 120 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.30% | 10 | 64 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 278 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.