uohu iw0ek0fo0 Vksyklks;e PS 430
Candidate Name 2 - BRIJBHUSHAN RAJPUT
BJPBharatiya Janata Party327 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3 - RAMJEEVAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 2 - BRIJBHUSHAN RAJPUT | BJP | 327 | 49.55% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3 - RAMJEEVAN | SP | 151 | 22.88% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 4 - VINOD KUMAR | BSP | 134 | 20.30% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 10 - Nota | NOTA | 12 | 1.82% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 1 - NIRDOSH KUMAR DIXIT | INC | 9 | 1.36% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 8 - ANIL KUMAR SINGH GOUR | IND | 8 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 7 - SANTOSH SINGH | JAP | 6 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 5 - KUNVARLAL | RRP | 6 | 0.91% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 9 - BHUVANENDRA NARAYAN SINGH | IND | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name 6 - PREMNARAYAN | AAP | 2 | 0.30% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 660 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 327 | 49.55% | 1 | 90 | Strong |
| SP | 151 | 22.88% | 2 | 152 | Weak |
| BSP | 134 | 20.30% | 3 | 121 | Weak |
| IND | 13 | 1.97% | 4 | 42 | Poor |
| NOTA | 12 | 1.82% | 5 | 27 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.36% | 6 | 290 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 0.91% | 7 | 176 | Poor |
| RRP | 6 | 0.91% | 8 | 32 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 207 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 231, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.