उ0 प्रा0वि0 रजौनी कम्पोजिट PS 1
Candidate Name 2 - BRIJBHUSHAN RAJPUT
BJPBharatiya Janata Party401 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3 - RAMJEEVAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 2 - BRIJBHUSHAN RAJPUT | BJP | 401 | 51.15% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3 - RAMJEEVAN | SP | 170 | 21.68% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 4 - VINOD KUMAR | BSP | 167 | 21.30% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 1 - NIRDOSH KUMAR DIXIT | INC | 23 | 2.93% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 8 - ANIL KUMAR SINGH GOUR | IND | 7 | 0.89% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 9 - BHUVANENDRA NARAYAN SINGH | IND | 6 | 0.77% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 10 - Nota | NOTA | 5 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 5 - KUNVARLAL | RRP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 7 - SANTOSH SINGH | JAP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name 6 - PREMNARAYAN | AAP | 1 | 0.13% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 784 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 401 | 51.15% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 170 | 21.68% | 2 | 113 | Weak |
| BSP | 167 | 21.30% | 3 | 65 | Weak |
| INC | 23 | 2.93% | 4 | 82 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 1.66% | 5 | 32 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.64% | 6 | 179 | Poor |
| RRP | 2 | 0.26% | 8 | 175 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.26% | 7 | 292 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 209 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 231, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.