P.S. MAMNA PS 82
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party377 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 377 | 72.64% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 71 | 13.68% | |
| 3 | SAGAR | INC | 23 | 4.43% | |
| 4 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 22 | 4.24% | |
| 5 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 7 | DEVRAJ | IND | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | MAHESH | IND | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 13 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 14 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 519 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 377 | 72.36% | 1 | 70 | Strong |
| SP | 71 | 13.63% | 2 | 281 | Weak |
| INC | 23 | 4.41% | 3 | 126 | Poor |
| BSP | 22 | 4.22% | 4 | 333 | Poor |
| IND | 20 | 3.84% | 5 | 54 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.58% | 6 | 178 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.38% | 7 | 105 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 185 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 292 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.