P.M.V. SIJWAHA PS 74
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party394 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 394 | 64.07% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 145 | 23.58% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 48 | 7.80% | |
| 4 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 9 | 1.46% | |
| 5 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | SAGAR | INC | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | MAHESH | IND | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | DEVRAJ | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 615 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 394 | 63.96% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| BSP | 145 | 23.54% | 2 | 91 | Weak |
| SP | 48 | 7.79% | 3 | 323 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 1.95% | 4 | 168 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.46% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.65% | 6 | 343 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 180 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 151 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 175 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 291 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.