P.S. DHIKWAHA PS 62
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party307 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 307 | 50.91% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 107 | 17.74% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 89 | 14.76% | |
| 4 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 42 | 6.97% | |
| 5 | SAGAR | INC | 17 | 2.82% | |
| 6 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 7 | 1.16% | |
| 7 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 6 | 1.00% | |
| 8 | DEVRAJ | IND | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 9 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 10 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 11 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 12 | MAHESH | IND | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 13 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 14 | EHSAN | BMP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 15 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 603 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 307 | 50.25% | 1 | 122 | Strong |
| SP | 107 | 17.51% | 2 | 203 | Weak |
| BSP | 89 | 14.57% | 3 | 174 | Weak |
| JAP | 42 | 6.87% | 4 | 33 | Poor |
| IND | 26 | 4.26% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 2.78% | 6 | 184 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.82% | 8 | 51 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.82% | 7 | 16 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.49% | 9 | 60 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.33% | 10 | 136 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.