P.S. NATHUPURA PS 47
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party436 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 436 | 53.50% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 244 | 29.94% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 60 | 7.36% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 35 | 4.29% | |
| 5 | MAHESH | IND | 8 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | EHSAN | BMP | 7 | 0.86% | |
| 7 | DEVRAJ | IND | 7 | 0.86% | |
| 8 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 4 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 13 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 15 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.12% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 815 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 436 | 53.17% | 1 | 38 | Strong |
| BSP | 244 | 29.76% | 2 | 21 | Average |
| SP | 60 | 7.32% | 3 | 306 | Poor |
| INC | 35 | 4.27% | 4 | 66 | Poor |
| IND | 25 | 3.05% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| BMP | 7 | 0.85% | 6 | 26 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.49% | 7 | 156 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.24% | 8 | 97 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 140 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 171 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.