P.S. BARI PS 348
SANJAY KUMAR SAHU
BSPBahujan Samaj Party212 votes at this polling station
over RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 212 | 38.55% | |
| 2 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 201 | 36.55% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 79 | 14.36% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 21 | 3.82% | |
| 5 | EHSAN | BMP | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 6 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 7 | MAHESH | IND | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 9 | DEVRAJ | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 10 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 12 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 13 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 550 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 212 | 38.34% | 1 | 35 | Average |
| BJP | 201 | 36.35% | 2 | 233 | Average |
| SP | 79 | 14.29% | 3 | 261 | Weak |
| INC | 21 | 3.80% | 4 | 157 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 3.07% | 5 | 97 | Poor |
| BMP | 8 | 1.45% | 6 | 24 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.90% | 7 | 26 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.54% | 8 | 87 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.54% | 9 | 198 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 253 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.