P.S. BAIHARI PS 336
MANOJ TIWARI
SPSamajwadi Party239 votes at this polling station
over RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 239 | 33.38% | |
| 2 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 195 | 27.23% | |
| 3 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 113 | 15.78% | |
| 4 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 87 | 12.15% | |
| 5 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 15 | 2.09% | |
| 6 | SAGAR | INC | 14 | 1.96% | |
| 7 | EHSAN | BMP | 13 | 1.82% | |
| 8 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 11 | 1.54% | |
| 9 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 7 | 0.98% | |
| 10 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 11 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 12 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 13 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 14 | MAHESH | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 15 | DEVRAJ | IND | 2 | 0.28% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 716 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 239 | 33.19% | 1 | 40 | Average |
| BJP | 195 | 27.08% | 2 | 238 | Average |
| JAP | 113 | 15.69% | 3 | 7 | Weak |
| BSP | 87 | 12.08% | 4 | 182 | Weak |
| IND | 28 | 3.89% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| BSCP | 15 | 2.08% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 1.94% | 7 | 234 | Poor |
| BMP | 13 | 1.81% | 8 | 8 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 0.97% | 9 | 12 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 5 | 0.69% | 10 | 37 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.