K.P.M.V. KHARELA COMPOSIT ATIRIKT ROOM NO 1 PS 328
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party383 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 383 | 60.99% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 93 | 14.81% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 77 | 12.26% | |
| 4 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 32 | 5.10% | |
| 5 | SAGAR | INC | 15 | 2.39% | |
| 6 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 7 | 1.11% | |
| 7 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | DEVRAJ | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | MAHESH | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | EHSAN | BMP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 12 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 13 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 14 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 628 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 383 | 60.89% | 1 | 62 | Strong |
| SP | 93 | 14.79% | 2 | 234 | Weak |
| BSP | 77 | 12.24% | 3 | 206 | Weak |
| AAP | 32 | 5.09% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| IND | 16 | 2.54% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| INC | 15 | 2.38% | 6 | 217 | Poor |
| BSCP | 7 | 1.11% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.48% | 8 | 119 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 150 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.