P.S. BARDA PS 319
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party247 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 247 | 55.26% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 110 | 24.61% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 72 | 16.11% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 8 | 1.79% | |
| 5 | MAHESH | IND | 4 | 0.89% | |
| 6 | EHSAN | BMP | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 7 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | DEVRAJ | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 447 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 247 | 55.13% | 1 | 189 | Strong |
| BSP | 110 | 24.55% | 2 | 143 | Weak |
| SP | 72 | 16.07% | 3 | 278 | Weak |
| INC | 8 | 1.79% | 4 | 315 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.56% | 5 | 270 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.45% | 6 | 182 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 244 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 348 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 348 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 345 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.