P.S. AKBAI ROOM NO 1 PS 310
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party193 votes at this polling station
over SAGAR (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 193 | 45.09% | |
| 2 | SAGAR | INC | 82 | 19.16% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 81 | 18.93% | |
| 4 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 47 | 10.98% | |
| 5 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 10 | 2.34% | |
| 6 | EHSAN | BMP | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 7 | MAHESH | IND | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | DEVRAJ | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 428 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 193 | 44.88% | 1 | 242 | Strong |
| INC | 82 | 19.07% | 2 | 13 | Weak |
| SP | 81 | 18.84% | 3 | 257 | Weak |
| BSP | 47 | 10.93% | 4 | 284 | Weak |
| JAP | 10 | 2.33% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.63% | 6 | 268 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 1.16% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 237 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 244 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 242 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.