P.S. KAHARA PS 296
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party193 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 193 | 45.63% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 91 | 21.51% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 52 | 12.29% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 44 | 10.40% | |
| 5 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 10 | 2.36% | |
| 6 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 8 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 4 | 0.95% | |
| 9 | EHSAN | BMP | 4 | 0.95% | |
| 10 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 11 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 12 | DEVRAJ | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 13 | MAHESH | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 14 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 15 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 0.47% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 423 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 193 | 45.31% | 1 | 241 | Strong |
| SP | 91 | 21.36% | 2 | 239 | Weak |
| BSP | 52 | 12.21% | 3 | 274 | Weak |
| INC | 44 | 10.33% | 4 | 44 | Weak |
| IND | 17 | 3.99% | 5 | 94 | Poor |
| BSCP | 10 | 2.35% | 6 | 21 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 1.41% | 7 | 139 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.94% | 9 | 76 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.94% | 8 | 38 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.47% | 10 | 142 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.