K.P.S. KAHRA ROOM NO 2 PS 295
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party252 votes at this polling station
over SAGAR (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 252 | 53.50% | |
| 2 | SAGAR | INC | 182 | 38.64% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 20 | 4.25% | |
| 4 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 13 | 2.76% | |
| 5 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 6 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | MAHESH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DEVRAJ | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 471 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 252 | 53.39% | 1 | 185 | Strong |
| INC | 182 | 38.56% | 2 | 3 | Average |
| SP | 20 | 4.24% | 3 | 351 | Poor |
| BSP | 13 | 2.75% | 4 | 348 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.64% | 5 | 333 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 239 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 344 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 341 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.