P.S. TAMAURA ROOM NO 1 PS 283
MANOJ TIWARI
SPSamajwadi Party199 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 199 | 42.61% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 155 | 33.19% | |
| 3 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 93 | 19.91% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 5 | DEVRAJ | IND | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 6 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | EHSAN | BMP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | MAHESH | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 467 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 199 | 42.43% | 1 | 71 | Strong |
| BSP | 155 | 33.05% | 2 | 77 | Average |
| BJP | 93 | 19.83% | 3 | 329 | Weak |
| IND | 10 | 2.13% | 4 | 210 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.28% | 5 | 338 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 140 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 172 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 339 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 340 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.