P.S. GHUTWAI PS 266
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party94 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 94 | 50.00% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 59 | 31.38% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 19 | 10.11% | |
| 4 | MAHESH | IND | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 5 | SAGAR | INC | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 6 | DEVRAJ | IND | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 7 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 8 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 9 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.53% | |
| 11 | EHSAN | BMP | 1 | 0.53% | |
| 12 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.53% | |
| 13 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 188 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 94 | 50.00% | 1 | 328 | Strong |
| BSP | 59 | 31.38% | 2 | 255 | Average |
| SP | 19 | 10.11% | 3 | 352 | Weak |
| IND | 8 | 4.26% | 4 | 249 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 1.60% | 5 | 352 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 1.06% | 6 | 134 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.53% | 8 | 258 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.53% | 7 | 223 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.53% | 9 | 230 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.