P.S. PACHAHARA PS 265
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party277 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 277 | 54.96% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 85 | 16.87% | |
| 3 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 66 | 13.10% | |
| 4 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 37 | 7.34% | |
| 5 | SAGAR | INC | 18 | 3.57% | |
| 6 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 7 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 8 | DEVRAJ | IND | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 9 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | MAHESH | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 504 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 277 | 54.53% | 1 | 157 | Strong |
| SP | 85 | 16.73% | 2 | 249 | Weak |
| JAP | 66 | 12.99% | 3 | 16 | Weak |
| BSP | 37 | 7.28% | 4 | 302 | Poor |
| INC | 18 | 3.54% | 5 | 181 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.97% | 6 | 207 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 6 | 1.18% | 7 | 24 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.79% | 8 | 84 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 222 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 341 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.