P.S. NAIGAWAN PS 261
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party343 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 343 | 70.43% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 84 | 17.25% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 22 | 4.52% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 21 | 4.31% | |
| 5 | MAHESH | IND | 6 | 1.23% | |
| 6 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | DEVRAJ | IND | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 487 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 343 | 69.57% | 1 | 91 | Strong |
| SP | 84 | 17.04% | 2 | 253 | Weak |
| BSP | 22 | 4.46% | 3 | 336 | Poor |
| INC | 21 | 4.26% | 4 | 156 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.84% | 5 | 145 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 277 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 6 | 220 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 231 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 340 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 338 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.