P.M.V. PAHRA PS 258
SAGAR
INCIndian National Congress249 votes at this polling station
over RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAGAR | INC | 249 | 48.73% | |
| 2 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 146 | 28.57% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 61 | 11.94% | |
| 4 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 27 | 5.28% | |
| 5 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 8 | 1.57% | |
| 6 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 8 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | DEVRAJ | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | EHSAN | BMP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | MAHESH | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 511 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INC | 249 | 48.44% | 1 | 2 | Strong |
| BJP | 146 | 28.40% | 2 | 293 | Average |
| BSP | 61 | 11.87% | 3 | 251 | Weak |
| SP | 27 | 5.25% | 4 | 348 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.33% | 5 | 171 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.56% | 6 | 118 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 4 | 0.78% | 7 | 51 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 143 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 255 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 219 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.