P.S. BARI PS 177
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party85 votes at this polling station
over SANJAY KUMAR SAHU (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 85 | 50.00% | |
| 2 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 34 | 20.00% | |
| 3 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 23 | 13.53% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 21 | 12.35% | |
| 5 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 6 | MAHESH | IND | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 7 | DEVRAJ | IND | 1 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 1 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | EHSAN | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 170 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 85 | 50.00% | 1 | 334 | Strong |
| BSP | 34 | 20.00% | 2 | 312 | Weak |
| SP | 23 | 13.53% | 3 | 350 | Weak |
| INC | 21 | 12.35% | 4 | 152 | Weak |
| IND | 6 | 3.53% | 5 | 284 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.59% | 6 | 266 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 326 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 313 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 314 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 332 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.