P.M.V. ATRARMAF ROOM NO 1 PS 17
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party574 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 574 | 78.52% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 63 | 8.62% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 36 | 4.92% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 17 | 2.33% | |
| 5 | MAHESH | IND | 11 | 1.50% | |
| 6 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 7 | 0.96% | |
| 7 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | EHSAN | BMP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | DEVRAJ | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 13 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 14 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 15 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 731 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 574 | 77.57% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| SP | 63 | 8.51% | 2 | 299 | Poor |
| BSP | 36 | 4.86% | 3 | 304 | Poor |
| IND | 27 | 3.65% | 4 | 10 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 2.30% | 5 | 183 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 7 | 0.95% | 6 | 14 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.54% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 203 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 165 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 261 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.