P.S. BEEJANAGAR PS 161
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party414 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 414 | 49.40% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 230 | 27.45% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 130 | 15.51% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 28 | 3.34% | |
| 5 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 9 | 1.07% | |
| 6 | MAHESH | IND | 6 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | EHSAN | BMP | 4 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | DEVRAJ | IND | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 14 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 15 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.12% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 838 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 414 | 49.17% | 1 | 46 | Strong |
| SP | 230 | 27.32% | 2 | 47 | Average |
| BSP | 130 | 15.44% | 3 | 116 | Weak |
| INC | 28 | 3.33% | 4 | 94 | Poor |
| IND | 18 | 2.14% | 5 | 74 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.07% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.48% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.36% | 8 | 65 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 187 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 204 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.