D.A.V.I.C. MAHOBA ROOM NO 6 PS 115
MANOJ TIWARI
SPSamajwadi Party422 votes at this polling station
over RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 422 | 72.51% | |
| 2 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 135 | 23.20% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 14 | 2.41% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 5 | 0.86% | |
| 5 | EHSAN | BMP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 6 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | DEVRAJ | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAHESH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 582 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 422 | 72.38% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 135 | 23.16% | 2 | 301 | Weak |
| BSP | 14 | 2.40% | 3 | 345 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.86% | 4 | 341 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 220 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.34% | 5 | 148 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 169 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 346 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 294 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 299 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.