U.P.S. NANAURA PRAMUKH PS 10
RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party543 votes at this polling station
over MANOJ TIWARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI | BJP | 543 | 73.18% | |
| 2 | MANOJ TIWARI | SP | 66 | 8.89% | |
| 3 | SANJAY KUMAR SAHU | BSP | 56 | 7.55% | |
| 4 | SAGAR | INC | 36 | 4.85% | |
| 5 | KULDEEP KUSHWAHA | JAP | 17 | 2.29% | |
| 6 | MAHESH | IND | 9 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | ARJUN KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | DEVRAJ | IND | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | DEVENDRA KUMAR NAGAICH | IND | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | ANIL KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | EHSAN | BMP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | KAMLESH KUMAR | BSCP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 14 | DEV PRATAP SINGH | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Mahesh Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 742 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 543 | 72.89% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| SP | 66 | 8.86% | 2 | 289 | Poor |
| BSP | 56 | 7.52% | 3 | 263 | Poor |
| INC | 36 | 4.83% | 4 | 61 | Poor |
| IND | 22 | 2.95% | 5 | 34 | Poor |
| JAP | 17 | 2.28% | 6 | 68 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 193 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 255 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 262 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 230, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.