çk0fo0fgaxkSjk PS 91
3-Ramesh Prasad
COL 1818424 votes at this polling station
over 1-Chandra Bhusan Singh Bundela (Guddu raja) (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3-Ramesh Prasad | COL 18 | 424 | 61.36% | |
| 2 | 1-Chandra Bhusan Singh Bundela (Guddu raja) | COL 12 | 179 | 25.90% | |
| 3 | 4-Ramratan Kushwaha | COL 21 | 76 | 11.00% | |
| 4 | 10-Pradip kumar Gupta | COL 39 | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 5 | 2-Balwant Singh Rajpoot | COL 15 | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 6 | 11-Rahul Kushwaha | COL 42 | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | 7-Hariom | COL 30 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | 8-Akhilesh Kumar | COL 33 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | 5-Vandana | COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | 6-sanjay Khan | COL 27 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | 9-Anil | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 691 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 424 | 60.92% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 179 | 25.72% | 2 | 126 | Average |
| COL 21 | 76 | 10.92% | 3 | 564 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 3 | 0.43% | 4 | 386 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 3 | 0.43% | 5 | 161 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.29% | 6 | 271 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 516 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 237 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 210 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 227 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 448 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 226, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.