jk0ck0ba0dk0 rkycsgV dåuå &4 PS 71
4-Ramratan Kushwaha
COL 2121434 votes at this polling station
over 3-Ramesh Prasad (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-Ramratan Kushwaha | COL 21 | 434 | 82.04% | |
| 2 | 3-Ramesh Prasad | COL 18 | 52 | 9.83% | |
| 3 | 1-Chandra Bhusan Singh Bundela (Guddu raja) | COL 12 | 30 | 5.67% | |
| 4 | 2-Balwant Singh Rajpoot | COL 15 | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 5 | 5-Vandana | COL 24 | 4 | 0.76% | |
| 6 | 7-Hariom | COL 30 | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | 11-Rahul Kushwaha | COL 42 | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | 8-Akhilesh Kumar | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | 9-Anil | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | 10-Pradip kumar Gupta | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | 6-sanjay Khan | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 529 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 434 | 81.43% | 1 | 86 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 52 | 9.76% | 2 | 391 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 30 | 5.63% | 3 | 534 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 7 | 1.31% | 4 | 171 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 4 | 0.75% | 5 | 331 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.19% | 6 | 202 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 378 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 388 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 445 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 473 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 387 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 226, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.