ljLorh Kku eafnj iwoZ ek0fo0 rkykciqjk n0Hkkx PS 459
4-Ramratan Kushwaha
COL 2121458 votes at this polling station
over 3-Ramesh Prasad (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-Ramratan Kushwaha | COL 21 | 458 | 76.97% | |
| 2 | 3-Ramesh Prasad | COL 18 | 67 | 11.26% | |
| 3 | 1-Chandra Bhusan Singh Bundela (Guddu raja) | COL 12 | 57 | 9.58% | |
| 4 | 2-Balwant Singh Rajpoot | COL 15 | 6 | 1.01% | |
| 5 | 7-Hariom | COL 30 | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 6 | 5-Vandana | COL 24 | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | 6-sanjay Khan | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | 8-Akhilesh Kumar | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | 9-Anil | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | 10-Pradip kumar Gupta | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | 11-Rahul Kushwaha | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 595 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 458 | 76.72% | 1 | 63 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 67 | 11.22% | 2 | 333 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 57 | 9.55% | 3 | 436 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 6 | 1.01% | 4 | 243 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 4 | 0.67% | 5 | 45 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 0.50% | 6 | 413 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 533 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 524 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 533 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 544 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 553 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 226, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.