jktdh; egkfoå i0Hkkx iqyokjk PS 224
4-Ramratan Kushwaha
COL 2121291 votes at this polling station
over 3-Ramesh Prasad (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-Ramratan Kushwaha | COL 21 | 291 | 57.40% | |
| 2 | 3-Ramesh Prasad | COL 18 | 120 | 23.67% | |
| 3 | 1-Chandra Bhusan Singh Bundela (Guddu raja) | COL 12 | 61 | 12.03% | |
| 4 | 5-Vandana | COL 24 | 17 | 3.35% | |
| 5 | 7-Hariom | COL 30 | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | 10-Pradip kumar Gupta | COL 39 | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | 11-Rahul Kushwaha | COL 42 | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | 2-Balwant Singh Rajpoot | COL 15 | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | 9-Anil | COL 36 | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | 8-Akhilesh Kumar | COL 33 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | 6-sanjay Khan | COL 27 | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 507 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 291 | 55.96% | 1 | 309 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 120 | 23.08% | 2 | 199 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 61 | 11.73% | 3 | 421 | Weak |
| COL 24 | 17 | 3.27% | 4 | 45 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 4 | 0.77% | 5 | 35 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 4 | 0.77% | 6 | 125 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 3 | 0.58% | 8 | 210 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 3 | 0.58% | 7 | 406 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 2 | 0.38% | 9 | 222 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 268 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 272 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 226, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.