Polling station 382 PS 382
Vinod Chaturvedi
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY384 votes at this polling station
over Chhote Singh (NISHA)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinod Chaturvedi | SP | 384 | 94.35% | |
| 2 | Chhote Singh | NISHA | 9 | 2.21% | |
| 3 | Umakanti | INC | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 4 | Shyam pal Urf Chunna Pal | BSP | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 5 | Ainul Hasan Mansoori | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 6 | Sundar | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | Anjna Devi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Shyam Kishor | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Jishan | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rais Ahmad | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Rajeev Kumar | CPIML | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Rohit Tripathi | RPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Veerendra Singh Parihar | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Arun Kumar | DSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 407 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 384 | 94.35% | 1 | 22 | Strong |
| NISHA | 9 | 2.21% | 2 | 485 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.98% | 3 | 499 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.98% | 4 | 490 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.98% | 5 | 465 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.49% | 6 | 335 | Poor |
| RPI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 452 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 488 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 443 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 490 | Poor |
| CPIML | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 453 | Poor |
| DSP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 486 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 220, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.