Polling station 326 PS 326
Vinod Chaturvedi
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY467 votes at this polling station
over Umakanti (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinod Chaturvedi | SP | 467 | 72.85% | |
| 2 | Umakanti | INC | 93 | 14.51% | |
| 3 | Shyam pal Urf Chunna Pal | BSP | 44 | 6.86% | |
| 4 | Chhote Singh | NISHA | 19 | 2.96% | |
| 5 | Jishan | JAP | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | Sundar | IND | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Arun Kumar | DSP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | Ainul Hasan Mansoori | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Anjna Devi | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Veerendra Singh Parihar | RJM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Shyam Kishor | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Rohit Tripathi | RPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Rais Ahmad | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Rajeev Kumar | CPIML | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 641 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 467 | 72.85% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| INC | 93 | 14.51% | 2 | 31 | Weak |
| BSP | 44 | 6.86% | 3 | 402 | Poor |
| NISHA | 19 | 2.96% | 4 | 461 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.09% | 5 | 462 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.78% | 6 | 107 | Poor |
| DSP | 3 | 0.47% | 7 | 151 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 324 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 348 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 411 | Poor |
| RPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 426 | Poor |
| CPIML | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 423 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 220, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.