Polling station 9 PS 9
Raghvendra Pratap Singh
BJPBharatiya Janata Party160 votes at this polling station
over Sheetal Kushwaha (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raghvendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 160 | 48.05% | |
| 2 | Sheetal Kushwaha | BSP | 119 | 35.74% | |
| 3 | Mool Chandra Singh | BJP | 47 | 14.11% | |
| 4 | Rambihari | IND | 3 | 0.90% | |
| 5 | Suresh Babu | IND | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | Siddarth Devolia | INC | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | Brijesh Chandra | JDL | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Bhagwan Singh | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Moolsharan | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ram Ji | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Jagatpal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Jitendra Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ravindra Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 333 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 160 | 48.05% | 1 | 91 | Strong |
| BSP | 119 | 35.74% | 2 | 256 | Average |
| BJP | 47 | 14.11% | 3 | 542 | Weak |
| IND | 5 | 1.50% | 4 | 338 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.30% | 5 | 449 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.30% | 6 | 488 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 252 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 349 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 326 | Poor |
| JDL | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 393 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 219, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.