Polling station 8 PS 8
Sheetal Kushwaha
BSPBahujan Samaj Party215 votes at this polling station
over Mool Chandra Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheetal Kushwaha | BSP | 215 | 95.13% | |
| 2 | Mool Chandra Singh | BJP | 5 | 2.21% | |
| 3 | Raghvendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 2 | 0.88% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.88% | |
| 5 | Rambihari | IND | 1 | 0.44% | |
| 6 | Siddarth Devolia | INC | 1 | 0.44% | |
| 7 | Brijesh Chandra | JDL | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Bhagwan Singh | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Moolsharan | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ram Ji | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Jagatpal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Jitendra Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ravindra Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Suresh Babu | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 226 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 215 | 95.13% | 1 | 87 | Strong |
| BJP | 5 | 2.21% | 2 | 570 | Poor |
| BJP | 2 | 0.88% | 3 | 577 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.88% | 4 | 421 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.44% | 5 | 534 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.44% | 6 | 448 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 325 | Poor |
| JDL | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 392 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 251 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 348 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 219, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.