PR. PATHSHALA CHAUBEPUR PS 97
PRASHANT AHIRWAR
BSPBahujan Samaj Party288 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 288 | 49.66% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 202 | 34.83% | |
| 3 | SAROJ | ADS | 67 | 11.55% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 12 | 2.07% | |
| 5 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 6 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 580 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 288 | 49.66% | 1 | 14 | Strong |
| SP | 202 | 34.83% | 2 | 124 | Average |
| ADS | 67 | 11.55% | 3 | 354 | Weak |
| NOTA | 12 | 2.07% | 4 | 12 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.52% | 5 | 71 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.52% | 6 | 325 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 219 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.34% | 8 | 296 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 209 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 325 | Poor |
| AAD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 338 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 314 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.