PR. PATHSHALA AGAPUR PS 68

AC 218 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

BHAGWATI PRASAD

SPSamajwadi Party

218 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

24 4.6 pp

votes

over SAROJ (ADS)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors869

Total turnout517votes cast at this station

Turnout %59.5% of this booth's roll

Male electors298

Female electors219

Vote share in this booth

of 517 votes counted

SP 42.2% ADS 37.5% BSP 15.1% JAP 1.2% ASP 1.2% INC 0.6% SJP 0.6% NOTA 0.6% IND 0.4% AAD 0.4% AAP 0.4%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	BHAGWATI PRASAD	SP	218	42.17%
2	SAROJ	ADS	194	37.52%
3	PRASHANT AHIRWAR	BSP	78	15.09%
4	MAMTA KUSHWAHA	JAP	6	1.16%
5	RAMJEEVAN	ASP	6	1.16%
6	RAJ NARAYAN	INC	3	0.58%
7	ASHOK PASWAN	SJP	3	0.58%
8	NOTA	NOTA	3	0.58%
9	AMIT KUMAR	IND	2	0.39%
10	VIPIN KUMAR	AAD	2	0.39%
11	Er. SANJAY PAL	AAP	2	0.39%
12	MUNNI LAL	BSCP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 517 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 218

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	218	42.17%	1	104	Strong
ADS	194	37.52%	2	208	Average
BSP	78	15.09%	3	160	Weak
ASP	6	1.16%	4	112	Poor
JAP	6	1.16%	5	65	Poor
NOTA	3	0.58%	7	203	Poor
SJP	3	0.58%	8	59	Poor
INC	3	0.58%	6	322	Poor
IND	2	0.39%	11	111	Poor
AAP	2	0.39%	9	211	Poor
AAD	2	0.39%	10	195	Poor
BSCP	0	0.00%	12	283	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.