PR. PATHSHALA MUIYA PS 43

AC 218 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

SAROJ

ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)

254 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

148 38.3 pp

votes

over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors634

Total turnout386votes cast at this station

Turnout %60.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors213

Female electors173

Vote share in this booth

of 386 votes counted

ADS 65.8% SP 27.5% INC 1.6% ASP 1.3% AAP 1.3% JAP 0.8% BSP 0.8% BSCP 0.5% AAD 0.3% IND 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	SAROJ	ADS	254	65.80%
2	BHAGWATI PRASAD	SP	106	27.46%
3	RAJ NARAYAN	INC	6	1.55%
4	RAMJEEVAN	ASP	5	1.30%
5	Er. SANJAY PAL	AAP	5	1.30%
6	MAMTA KUSHWAHA	JAP	3	0.78%
7	PRASHANT AHIRWAR	BSP	3	0.78%
8	MUNNI LAL	BSCP	2	0.52%
9	VIPIN KUMAR	AAD	1	0.26%
10	AMIT KUMAR	IND	1	0.26%
11	NOTA	NOTA	0	0.00%
12	ASHOK PASWAN	SJP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 386 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 218

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
ADS	254	65.80%	1	125	Strong
SP	106	27.46%	2	272	Average
INC	6	1.55%	3	215	Poor
AAP	5	1.30%	4	74	Poor
ASP	5	1.30%	5	142	Poor
JAP	3	0.78%	7	110	Poor
BSP	3	0.78%	6	376	Poor
BSCP	2	0.52%	8	100	Poor
IND	1	0.26%	10	189	Poor
AAD	1	0.26%	9	259	Poor
NOTA	0	0.00%	11	362	Poor
SJP	0	0.00%	12	300	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.