PR. PATHSHALA SHRINAGAR PS 42
MAMTA KUSHWAHA
JAPJan Adhikar Party170 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 170 | 30.14% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 158 | 28.01% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 134 | 23.76% | |
| 4 | SAROJ | ADS | 72 | 12.77% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 10 | 1.77% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 9 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 10 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 564 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAP | 170 | 30.14% | 1 | 3 | Average |
| SP | 158 | 28.01% | 2 | 188 | Average |
| BSP | 134 | 23.76% | 3 | 79 | Weak |
| ADS | 72 | 12.77% | 4 | 344 | Weak |
| NOTA | 10 | 1.77% | 5 | 25 | Poor |
| ASP | 5 | 0.89% | 6 | 141 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.71% | 7 | 105 | Poor |
| AAD | 4 | 0.71% | 8 | 95 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.71% | 9 | 291 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.35% | 10 | 99 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 188 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 299 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.