JR. H. SCHOOL BARIPAL ROOM NO.4 PS 354
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party333 votes at this polling station
over PRASHANT AHIRWAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 333 | 67.27% | |
| 2 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 86 | 17.37% | |
| 3 | SAROJ | ADS | 54 | 10.91% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 9 | 1.82% | |
| 5 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 4 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 7 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 495 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 333 | 67.27% | 1 | 32 | Strong |
| BSP | 86 | 17.37% | 2 | 143 | Weak |
| ADS | 54 | 10.91% | 3 | 360 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 1.82% | 4 | 143 | Poor |
| AAD | 4 | 0.81% | 5 | 132 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.61% | 6 | 279 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 201 | Poor |
| SJP | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 173 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 352 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 246 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 386 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 384 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.