PR. PATHSHALA KAMANDALPUR M. KIRANV PS 35
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)232 votes at this polling station
over PRASHANT AHIRWAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 232 | 43.45% | |
| 2 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 182 | 34.08% | |
| 3 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 91 | 17.04% | |
| 4 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 8 | 1.50% | |
| 5 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 6 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 6 | 1.12% | |
| 7 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 534 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 232 | 43.45% | 1 | 156 | Strong |
| BSP | 182 | 34.08% | 2 | 44 | Average |
| SP | 91 | 17.04% | 3 | 297 | Weak |
| BSCP | 8 | 1.50% | 4 | 13 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.12% | 5 | 214 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 1.12% | 6 | 63 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.56% | 7 | 150 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.37% | 8 | 286 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 257 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 309 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 189 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 187 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.