POORV M. VIDDYALAY GUGURA ROOM NO. 1 PS 333
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party204 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 204 | 49.88% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 122 | 29.83% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 65 | 15.89% | |
| 4 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 6 | 1.47% | |
| 5 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 6 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 3 | 0.73% | |
| 7 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 409 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 204 | 49.88% | 1 | 122 | Strong |
| ADS | 122 | 29.83% | 2 | 296 | Average |
| BSP | 65 | 15.89% | 3 | 185 | Weak |
| ASP | 6 | 1.47% | 4 | 130 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.22% | 5 | 280 | Poor |
| AAD | 3 | 0.73% | 6 | 177 | Poor |
| SJP | 2 | 0.49% | 7 | 170 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 275 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 351 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 378 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 362 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.