PR. PATHSHALA TIWARIPUR SADH ROOM NO.1 PS 325
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party165 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 165 | 40.15% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 150 | 36.50% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 78 | 18.98% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 5 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.73% | |
| 7 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 411 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 165 | 40.15% | 1 | 173 | Strong |
| ADS | 150 | 36.50% | 2 | 264 | Average |
| BSP | 78 | 18.98% | 3 | 162 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 0.97% | 4 | 312 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.97% | 5 | 100 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.73% | 6 | 275 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.49% | 7 | 294 | Poor |
| SJP | 2 | 0.49% | 8 | 167 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 313 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 238 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.24% | 11 | 272 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.