PR. PATHSHALA RAVAIPUR M. KORIYAN ROOM NO. 2 PS 300
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party166 votes at this polling station
over SAROJ (ADS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 166 | 41.50% | |
| 2 | SAROJ | ADS | 135 | 33.75% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 71 | 17.75% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 8 | 2.00% | |
| 5 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 7 | 1.75% | |
| 6 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 11 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 12 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 400 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 166 | 41.50% | 1 | 172 | Strong |
| ADS | 135 | 33.75% | 2 | 277 | Average |
| BSP | 71 | 17.75% | 3 | 174 | Weak |
| INC | 8 | 2.00% | 4 | 163 | Poor |
| ASP | 7 | 1.75% | 5 | 102 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.75% | 6 | 184 | Poor |
| AAD | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 234 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.50% | 8 | 151 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.50% | 9 | 159 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.50% | 10 | 291 | Poor |
| SJP | 2 | 0.50% | 11 | 159 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 363 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.