PR. PATHSHALA PADRI GANGADEEN ROOM NO. 2 PS 293
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)173 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 173 | 41.89% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 124 | 30.02% | |
| 3 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 95 | 23.00% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 9 | 2.18% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 6 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 413 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 173 | 41.89% | 1 | 234 | Strong |
| SP | 124 | 30.02% | 2 | 237 | Average |
| BSP | 95 | 23.00% | 3 | 129 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 2.18% | 4 | 139 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.97% | 5 | 209 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.97% | 6 | 180 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.48% | 7 | 195 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 231 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 312 | Poor |
| AAD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 374 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 368 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 363 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.