PR. PATHSHALA AJGARPUR M. GADATHA ROOM NO. 1 PS 29
SAROJ
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)195 votes at this polling station
over BHAGWATI PRASAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAROJ | ADS | 195 | 68.42% | |
| 2 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 50 | 17.54% | |
| 3 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 10 | 3.51% | |
| 4 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 8 | 2.81% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 2.11% | |
| 6 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 5 | 1.75% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 8 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 9 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 10 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 1 | 0.35% | |
| 12 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 285 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 195 | 68.42% | 1 | 205 | Strong |
| SP | 50 | 17.54% | 2 | 351 | Weak |
| ASP | 10 | 3.51% | 3 | 36 | Poor |
| BSP | 8 | 2.81% | 4 | 339 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 2.11% | 5 | 80 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.75% | 6 | 254 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 1.05% | 9 | 108 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 1.05% | 7 | 148 | Poor |
| AAD | 3 | 1.05% | 8 | 140 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.35% | 11 | 186 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.35% | 10 | 186 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 267 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.