PR. PATHSHALA SATRAHULI ROOM NO.1 PS 243
BHAGWATI PRASAD
SPSamajwadi Party440 votes at this polling station
over PRASHANT AHIRWAR (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHAGWATI PRASAD | SP | 440 | 55.07% | |
| 2 | PRASHANT AHIRWAR | BSP | 274 | 34.29% | |
| 3 | SAROJ | ADS | 51 | 6.38% | |
| 4 | RAJ NARAYAN | INC | 9 | 1.13% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 1.00% | |
| 6 | Er. SANJAY PAL | AAP | 6 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | VIPIN KUMAR | AAD | 5 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | ASHOK PASWAN | SJP | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | AMIT KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | RAMJEEVAN | ASP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | MUNNI LAL | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAMTA KUSHWAHA | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 799 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 440 | 55.07% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| BSP | 274 | 34.29% | 2 | 17 | Average |
| ADS | 51 | 6.38% | 3 | 361 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.13% | 4 | 137 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 1.00% | 5 | 54 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 0.75% | 6 | 62 | Poor |
| AAD | 5 | 0.63% | 7 | 77 | Poor |
| SJP | 3 | 0.38% | 8 | 79 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.25% | 9 | 149 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 351 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 352 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 334 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 218, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.